Claims

Remote learning was not associated with increased attrition among Pennsylvania elementary school teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among elementary school teachers, remote learning showed no association with increased attrition during the pandemic. → Stephen Lipscomb 2023

Evidence

Stephen Lipscomb 2023

Stephen Lipscomb, Ijun Lai, Duncan Chaplin, Alma Vigil, Hena Matthias. (2023). Staff Attrition from Pennsylvania Public Schools During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mathematica. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Observational analysis relating elementary teachers' remote learning conditions to attrition in Pennsylvania public schools during the pandemic. The brief reports no association with increased attrition; no effect size or test statistic is printed, so the finding is reported as a non-association, not tested equivalence.

"Remote learning was not associated with increased attrition among elementary school teachers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id remote-learning-not-associated-elementary-teacher-attrition
title Remote learning was not associated with increased attrition among Pennsylvania elementary school teachers
description Remote learning was not associated with increased attrition among Pennsylvania elementary school teachers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — stephen-lipscomb-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.