Learner repair following feedback differed by setting: prompts yielded the largest proportion of repair in French immersion, recasts in Japanese immersion¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Student uptake and repair patterns varied distinctively by feedback type, with prompts producing the largest proportion of repair in French immersion and recasts producing the largest proportion in Japanese immersion. → Roy Lyster and Hirohide Mori 2006
Evidence¶
Roy Lyster and Hirohide Mori 2006¶
Roy Lyster and Hirohide Mori. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269-300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Observational analysis of immediate effects of the three feedback types on learner uptake and repair across the two immersion settings. The article reports "the largest proportion of repair resulting from prompts in French immersion and from recasts in Japanese immersion." No effect size is printed.
"distinctively varied student uptake and repair patterns in relation to feedback type, with the largest proportion of repair resulting from prompts in French immersion and from recasts in Japanese immersion"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Producing modified output involving developmentally advanced question forms in response to negative feedback is the only significant predictor of ESL question development — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Recasts were provided more predominantly than prompts and explicit correction in both French immersion and Japanese immersion elementary classrooms — related
- The study compared feedback-uptake relationships across two immersion settings totaling 18.3 hr of French and 14.8 hr of Japanese classroom interaction — related
- The frequency of oral corrective feedback differs across instructional contexts — a broader claim this one bears on
- Laboratory and classroom studies assess the effects of recasts and different CF types differentially — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
repair-patterns-vary-by-feedback-type-and-setting |
title |
Learner repair following feedback differed by setting: prompts yielded the largest proportion of repair in French immersion, recasts in Japanese immersion |
description |
Learner repair following feedback differed by setting: prompts yielded the largest proportion of repair in French immersion, recasts in Japanese immersion |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — roy-lyster-and-hirohide-mori-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.