Probe-caught affect reports show stronger self-loops among core epistemic states, while self-caught reports show more distributed transitions involving higher-arousal states¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? ONA models built from probe-caught reports exhibit stronger self-loops among the core epistemic states, whereas self-caught models show more distributed transitions involving frustration, surprise, and conflict. → Sifatul Anindho 2026
Evidence¶
Sifatul Anindho 2026¶
Sifatul Anindho, Videep Venkatesha, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh, and Nathaniel Blanchard. (2026). Ordered Network Analysis of Epistemic Emotions during Collaborative Problem Solving. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23317 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.23317
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Separate ONA models for self-caught and probe-caught reports (64% probe-caught vs. 36% self-caught) show "stronger self-loops among the core epistemic states" in probe-caught data, while self-caught reports showed more distributed transitions involving higher-arousal states such as frustration, surprise, and conflict.
"ONA models constructed from probe-caught reports exhibit stronger self-loops among the core epistemic states, indicating more sustained epistemic engagement over time. In contrast, ONA models constructed from self-caught reports showed more distributed transitions that involved affective states typified by higher arousal, such as frustration, surprise, and conflict."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Curious, optimistic, and confused are the most frequently reported affective states, and self-caught reports are more evenly distributed than probe-caught reports — related
- Affective experience during situated collaborative problem solving is organized around a stable epistemic core linking curiosity, optimism, and confusion with short-range persistence — related
- Faster CPS groups show stronger transitions among curiosity and optimism, while slower groups show stronger transitions among confusion, conflict, and frustration — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reporting-method-shapes-affective-network-structure |
title |
Probe-caught affect reports show stronger self-loops among core epistemic states, while self-caught reports show more distributed transitions involving higher-arousal states |
description |
Probe-caught affect reports show stronger self-loops among core epistemic states, while self-caught reports show more distributed transitions involving higher-arousal states |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sifatul-anindho-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.