Teachers treat resilience under challenge as a teachable skill that current routines and dashboards do little to support¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Teachers described students freezing or abandoning problems after initial failure and viewed resilience as teachable but unsupported by current tools. → Conrad Borchers 2026
Evidence¶
Conrad Borchers 2026¶
Conrad Borchers. (2026). Framing the 5% Problem: Teachers’ Perspectives on Persistence in Educational Technology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22294 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22294
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Resilience and persistence under challenge theme from the workshop's thematic analysis. Teachers described students who "froze, abandoned problems after initial failure" and treated resilience as teachable, yet unsupported by current routines and dashboards.
"Teachers described students who froze, abandoned problems after initial failure, or lacked independent problem- solving strategies. They treated resilience as a teachable skill that current rou- tines and dashboards did little to support."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learners' task-specific self-efficacy beliefs predict whether they initiate, persist through, and recover from difficulty on academic tasks. — related
- Introducing more challenging work without sufficient supports or attention to students' emotions and learning strategies can lead to frustration, withdrawal, disruption, and less learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- Praise for intelligence, rather than for effort, after success undermines children's motivation and performance after a later failure — related
- Pursuing unrealistic goals can lead to discouragement and frustration, so goals should balance rigor with realism — related
- Instruction must be challenging for learning gains, but raising challenge without classroom control and student support harms grades and engagement — related
- The usefulness of the GAP depends on players being sufficiently challenged in the game — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
resilience-teachable-skill-unsupported |
title |
Teachers treat resilience under challenge as a teachable skill that current routines and dashboards do little to support |
description |
Teachers treat resilience under challenge as a teachable skill that current routines and dashboards do little to support |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — conrad-borchers-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.