Claims

Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In 10 observed resource rooms, teachers spent less than 10% of instructional time on logistical tasks and students' overall engagement averaged 2.76 on a 3-point scale. → Swanson 2010

Evidence

Swanson 2010

Swanson, E. A., & Vaughn, S. (2010). An Observation Study of Reading Instruction Provided to Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities in the Resource Room. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20484

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational study of 10 special education resource-room teachers, with 2,178 minutes of reading instruction coded using the ICE-R over three consecutive observation days. The discussion reports "students remained on task, with an overall student engagement rating across all observations of 2.76 on a 3-point scale" and less than 10% of time on logistical tasks.

"students remained on task, with an overall student engagement rating across all observations of 2.76 on a 3-point scale (range = 2.43–3.0)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id resource-room-reading-instruction-on-task-engagement
title Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale
description Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — swanson-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.