Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In 10 observed resource rooms, teachers spent less than 10% of instructional time on logistical tasks and students' overall engagement averaged 2.76 on a 3-point scale. → Swanson 2010
Evidence¶
Swanson 2010¶
Swanson, E. A., & Vaughn, S. (2010). An Observation Study of Reading Instruction Provided to Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities in the Resource Room. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20484
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Observational study of 10 special education resource-room teachers, with 2,178 minutes of reading instruction coded using the ICE-R over three consecutive observation days. The discussion reports "students remained on task, with an overall student engagement rating across all observations of 2.76 on a 3-point scale" and less than 10% of time on logistical tasks.
"students remained on task, with an overall student engagement rating across all observations of 2.76 on a 3-point scale (range = 2.43–3.0)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Phonological awareness instruction closely tied to word reading (blending and segmenting phonemes) comprised less than 1% of observed resource-room reading time — related
- Phonics/word study occupied the largest share of observed resource-room reading instruction (32%) at high-average quality, but a quarter was rated weak — related
- Comprehension instruction in resource rooms consisted mostly of teacher question-and-answer monitoring rather than explicit comprehension-strategy instruction — related
- Non-instructional time averages 23 percent in observed Chicago elementary classrooms, with half of teachers at 14 percent and half at 30 percent — related
- Whole-group instruction was the most common grouping structure in elementary resource-room reading instruction despite small class sizes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
resource-room-reading-instruction-on-task-engagement |
title |
Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale |
description |
Teachers and students in elementary resource rooms remained on task during reading instruction, with overall student engagement averaging 2.76 on a 3-point scale |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — swanson-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.