Academic benefits of restorative practice exposure are stronger for Black and Latino/a students than for White students, suggesting practices can reduce racial gaps¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A 1-unit increase in restorative practice exposure was associated with a 7-unit ELA score increase for White students versus a 17-unit increase for Black students. → Darling-Hammond 2023
Evidence¶
Darling-Hammond 2023¶
Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Same observational analysis of 485 middle schools; the report reports subgroup associations and concludes benefits were "slightly stronger for Latino/a students and substantially stronger for Black students," quoting the printed 7-unit and 17-unit ELA figures.
"a 1-unit increase in restorative practice exposure was associated with a 7-unit increase in English language arts scores for White students and a 17-unit increase for Black students."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Race and Ethnicity — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Shifting to restorative practices reduced exclusionary discipline and its racial disparities while improving climate and achievement — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Restorative practices reduce exclusionary discipline and misbehavior and improve school climate, safety, and achievement, though implementation requires sustained investment — a broader claim this one bears on
- Student exposure to restorative practices improves standardized test performance and reduces suspension probability and duration — a broader claim this one bears on
- Prior-year heat exposure reduces learning, with about 3 times greater impact on Black and Hispanic/Latine students than White students — related
- Experts report reduced suspensions and expulsions and improved school climate as RJ implementation successes — related
- Denver Public Schools' restorative justice reforms coincided with falling suspension rates and a narrowed Black-White suspension gap — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
restorative-practice-benefits-stronger-black-latino-students |
title |
Academic benefits of restorative practice exposure are stronger for Black and Latino/a students than for White students, suggesting practices can reduce racial gaps |
description |
Academic benefits of restorative practice exposure are stronger for Black and Latino/a students than for White students, suggesting practices can reduce racial gaps |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — darling-hammond-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.