Training restructuring strategies fosters grade-2 students' flexibility in dealing with additive situations relative to a control group, with stronger growth at follow-up¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 The experimental group developed differently from the control group on the flexibility test, with a small interaction effect. → Laura Gabler 2024
q2 i1 Growth from pretest to follow-up was significantly stronger in the experimental group (d = 0.33). → Laura Gabler 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Laura Gabler 2024¶
Laura Gabler, Stefan Ufer. (2024). Training flexibility in dealing with additive situations. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101902
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Repeated measures ANOVA on flexibility scores of 115 second graders randomly assigned within classrooms to training or control. The time × treatment interaction was significant: "F(222.00, 2) = 3.17, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.03".
"A repeated measures ANOVA (Table 3) showed a significant interaction effect of measurement time and treatment group with a small effect size (F(222.00, 2) = 3.17, p = 0.044, ηp2 = 0.03)."
Laura Gabler 2024 (2)¶
Laura Gabler, Stefan Ufer. (2024). Training flexibility in dealing with additive situations. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101902
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Post-hoc contrasts on flexibility scores show the pretest-to-follow-up growth advantage of the experimental group: "b = 1.20, p = 0.03, d = 0.33"; the pre-to-post contrast was not significant.
"The performance growth between pretest and follow-up was significantly stronger in the experimental than in the control group (b = 1.20, p = 0.03, d = 0.33), but not from pretest to posttest (b = 0.87, p = 0.16, d = 0.24)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Mathematical Flexibility — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Training restructuring strategies improves grade-2 students' word problem solving skills at four-week follow-up relative to a control group — related
- Descriptively, the experimental group's strongest word problem solving gains from pretest to follow-up appeared for compare problems — related
- Training effects on flexibility and word problem solving are delayed, appearing at four-week follow-up but not directly after the training — related
- Training effects on flexibility and word problem solving do not differ between students with low and high language skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
restructuring-training-fosters-additive-flexibility |
title |
Training restructuring strategies fosters grade-2 students' flexibility in dealing with additive situations relative to a control group, with stronger growth at follow-up |
description |
Training restructuring strategies fosters grade-2 students' flexibility in dealing with additive situations relative to a control group, with stronger growth at follow-up |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — laura-gabler-2024, laura-gabler-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.