Claims

African-American students' disproportionate retention was largely explained by lower prior test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After adjusting for prior reading and math achievement, African-American and Latino students were no more, and in some grades less, likely to be retained than white and other race students. → Nagaoka 2004

Evidence

Nagaoka 2004

Nagaoka, J., & Roderick, M. (2004). Ending Social Promotion: The Effects of Retention. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/ending-social-promotion-effects-retention

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Observational analysis of retention probabilities by race (Graph 2), 1998-2000, unadjusted and adjusted for prior reading and math scores; unadjusted disparities favoring higher African-American retention reversed or disappeared after adjustment.

"after adjusting for prior achievement, African-American third graders were not more likely to be retained and were actually less likely to be retained in the sixth and eighth grades."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retention-racial-disparity-explained-by-scores
title African-American students' disproportionate retention was largely explained by lower prior test scores
description African-American students' disproportionate retention was largely explained by lower prior test scores
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nagaoka-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.