Claims

In one thermodynamics study, retention and transfer scores tended to be lower on topics of higher element interactivity, a descriptive pattern with several sessions that did not fit it

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Comparing session-level retention and transfer scores with experts' element interactivity classification of the session topics, the authors concluded that scores generally decreased as element interactivity rose, but the pattern was not consistent: the control group's highest retention score came in a high-interactivity session (Session 7) and a low one in a low-interactivity session (Session 4), and the authors note that teaching style and question type (conceptual versus procedural) also affected scores. → Kala 2023

Evidence

Kala 2023

Kala, N., & Ayas, A. (2023). Effect of instructional design based on cognitive load theory on students' performances and the indicators of element interactivity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(3), 468-489. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.027

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis of the eight RTs and TTs plotted against the experts' low/high/very-high classification (Figures 3 and 4): the authors determined that "as the element interactivity level of the topics learned in the study increased, learning became more difficult and scores decreased." This is a descriptive reading of the plots with no test of the trend, and it has exceptions the authors list: all students in Session 5 and the control group in Session 4 scored lower than the experts' classification predicted, the control group's highest retention score came in high-interactivity Session 7, and the authors attribute part of the variation to teaching style and to conceptual versus procedural questions.

"it was determined that as the element interactivity level of the topics learned in the study increased, learning became more difficult and scores decreased."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retention-transfer-scores-decrease-with-element-interactivity
title In one thermodynamics study, retention and transfer scores tended to be lower on topics of higher element interactivity, a descriptive pattern with several sessions that did not fit it
description In one thermodynamics study, retention and transfer scores tended to be lower on topics of higher element interactivity, a descriptive pattern with several sessions that did not fit it
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kala-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.