As predicted by the adaptive strategy choice model, children's retrieval frequency correlates with retrieval efficiency but not with procedural efficiency¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Percentage retrieval use significantly predicted retrieval latency in all grades but did not predict procedural efficiency in any grade, supporting Siegler's prediction. → Ineke Imbo · André Vandierendonck 2008
Evidence¶
Ineke Imbo · André Vandierendonck 2008¶
Ineke Imbo · André Vandierendonck. (2008). Effects of problem size, operation, and working-memory span on simple-arithmetic strategies: differences between children and adults? Psychological Research (2008) 72:331–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0112-8
q2 · i2 · associational · r1
Correlational and regression analyses across the three grades showed retrieval use correlated negatively with retrieval RTs (r = −0.239 in second grade, −0.164 in fourth, −0.320 in sixth, all significant at the 0.01 level), while retrieval use did not predict procedural RTs in any grade.
"A Wnal interesting observation was that, as predicted by Siegler ( 1988), percentage retrieval use did predict retrieval e Yciency but not procedural eYciency."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Mathematical Flexibility — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Operations and Place Value — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Retrieval is faster and procedural execution more efficient on addition than on multiplication problems, and these operation effects persist across the primary school years — related
- Two sources of the problem-size effect — more frequent and more efficient retrieval on small than large problems — are present in children of all grades, while the procedural-efficiency source is present only in second grade — related
- The advantage of a large working-memory span on children's arithmetic strategy use decreases across grades: span predicts retrieval frequency in second grade only and retrieval efficiency in second and fourth grade only — related
- Retrieval use increases with grade, and the small-versus-large difference in retrieval use decreases significantly between fourth and sixth grade only — related
- Both a predominantly computational-strategy task and a retrieval-expected task show most support for the computational efficiency model of multiplication difficulty. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
retrieval-frequency-correlates-retrieval-efficiency |
title |
As predicted by the adaptive strategy choice model, children's retrieval frequency correlates with retrieval efficiency but not with procedural efficiency |
description |
As predicted by the adaptive strategy choice model, children's retrieval frequency correlates with retrieval efficiency but not with procedural efficiency |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ineke-imbo-andré-vandierendonck-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.