Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Kang (2010), advantages of retrieval practice over restudy when subjects mentally visualized Chinese characters during retrieval. → Karpicke 2017
q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Carpenter and Pashler (2007), that retrieving missing map landmarks produced better map redrawing on a final test than restudy. → Karpicke 2017 (2)
q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Karpicke and Blunt (2011, Experiment 2), equivalent retrieval practice effects for enumeration and sequential text structures. → Karpicke 2017 (3)
Evidence¶
Karpicke 2017¶
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The chapter reports Kang (2010), with materials presumably not verbalizable: "He observed advantages of retrieval practice relative to a restudy condition with these materials".
"Kang (2010) had subjects practice retrieval of Chinese characters by mentally visualizing the characters during retrieval trials. He observed advantages of retrieval practice relative to a restudy condition with these materials."
Karpicke 2017 (2)¶
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The chapter reports Carpenter and Pashler (2007), in which students retrieving missing landmarks "showed better retention when they were asked to redraw the maps on a final test relative to a restudy control condition".
"Following initial encoding of the maps, students who expe- rienced maps with missing landmarks dthereby requiring the students to retrieve the landmarks dshowed better retention when they were asked to redraw the maps on a final test relative to a restudy control condition."
Karpicke 2017 (3)¶
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
q2 · i? · review · r2
The chapter reports Karpicke and Blunt (2011, Experiment 2), which compared enumeration and sequential texts and "found equivalent retrieval practice effects for texts with different structures"; equivalence was not formally tested.
"Karpicke and Blunt found equivalent retrieval practice effects for texts with different structures"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
-
Existing theoretical accounts attributing the testing effect to enhanced semantic elaboration receive limited support — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Test-enhanced learning generalizes across education levels, from elementary school (g = 0.328) through university/college (g = 0.486). — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- A review chapter (Karpicke 2017) reports, second-hand, experiments in which retrieval practice produced more learning than concept mapping (Karpicke & Blunt 2011) and than imagery strategies such as the keyword mnemonic (Karpicke & Smith 2012) — related
- Concept mapping improves learning over most comparison conditions by a moderate average amount, but not over time-matched retrieval practice — related
- Retrieval practice enhances performance on final inference and transfer questions relative to restudying, although a single-word fill-in-the-blank task did not — related
- Neuroimaging and stimulation evidence supports shared mechanisms: primary visual cortex activation during imagery — related
- The testing benefit for map learning holds under both quadrant-based and relative-position-based scoring, liberal and stringent — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Retrieval-based learning research emphasizes both direct and indirect effects of retrieval on learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
retrieval-practice-benefits-extend-to-nonverbal-spatial-and-differently-structured-text-materials |
title |
Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures |
description |
Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
3 — karpicke-2017, karpicke-2017-2, karpicke-2017-3 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.