Claims

Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Kang (2010), advantages of retrieval practice over restudy when subjects mentally visualized Chinese characters during retrieval. → Karpicke 2017 q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Carpenter and Pashler (2007), that retrieving missing map landmarks produced better map redrawing on a final test than restudy. → Karpicke 2017 (2) q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Karpicke and Blunt (2011, Experiment 2), equivalent retrieval practice effects for enumeration and sequential text structures. → Karpicke 2017 (3)

Evidence

Karpicke 2017

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports Kang (2010), with materials presumably not verbalizable: "He observed advantages of retrieval practice relative to a restudy condition with these materials".

"Kang (2010) had subjects practice retrieval of Chinese characters by mentally visualizing the characters during retrieval trials. He observed advantages of retrieval practice relative to a restudy condition with these materials."

Karpicke 2017 (2)

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The chapter reports Carpenter and Pashler (2007), in which students retrieving missing landmarks "showed better retention when they were asked to redraw the maps on a final test relative to a restudy control condition".

"Following initial encoding of the maps, students who expe- rienced maps with missing landmarks dthereby requiring the students to retrieve the landmarks dshowed better retention when they were asked to redraw the maps on a final test relative to a restudy control condition."

Karpicke 2017 (3)

Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9

q2 · i? · review · r2

The chapter reports Karpicke and Blunt (2011, Experiment 2), which compared enumeration and sequential texts and "found equivalent retrieval practice effects for texts with different structures"; equivalence was not formally tested.

"Karpicke and Blunt found equivalent retrieval practice effects for texts with different structures"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retrieval-practice-benefits-extend-to-nonverbal-spatial-and-differently-structured-text-materials
title Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures
description Retrieval practice benefits extend to nonverbal visual materials, spatial map learning, and educational texts with different structures
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — karpicke-2017, karpicke-2017-2, karpicke-2017-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.