Claims

A math teacher whose students had typically prepared for tests by rereading notes implemented three retrieval-practice strategies after learning that rereading is not effective for long-term retention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? After a research presentation on retrieval practice, teacher Dan Newell implemented retrieval practice in his classes using three strategies, motivated by evidence that rereading notes is ineffective for long-term remembering. → Improving Research and Practice through Partnership: Lessons Learned from Santa Clara Unified Schools and UC San Francisco Researchers 2016

Evidence

Improving Research and Practice through Partnership: Lessons Learned from Santa Clara Unified Schools and UC San Francisco Researchers 2016

Improving Research and Practice through Partnership: Lessons Learned from Santa Clara Unified Schools and UC San Francisco Researchers. (2016). Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/319db7e4-46fb-4f18-a6f0-628edf43ae9e

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Case study of research use in practice: a former NMSA math teacher (the source does not say what grade levels NMSA serves), motivated by Uncapher's presentation on retrieval practices shown to improve retention, implemented retrieval practice in his classes with three strategies; his students had typically prepared for tests by rereading their notes. The source does not say whether he stopped them rereading. No outcome data are reported.

"His students had typically prepared for tests by “reading and rereading” their notes, but research has shown that this strategy is not effective for remembering information over the long term. Newell decided to implement retrieval practice with his classes using three strategies."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id retrieval-practice-implementation-case-newell
title A math teacher whose students had typically prepared for tests by rereading notes implemented three retrieval-practice strategies after learning that rereading is not effective for long-term retention
description A math teacher whose students had typically prepared for tests by rereading notes implemented three retrieval-practice strategies after learning that rereading is not effective for long-term retention
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — improving-research-and-practice-through-partnership-lessons-learned-from-santa-clara-unified-schools-and-uc-san-francisco-researchers-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.