A 2024 systematic review identified 22 studies validating 16 AI literacy scales, most of them self-report rather than performance-based¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A systematic review of AI literacy scales identified 22 studies validating 16 scales, with 13 self-report scales compared to 3 performance-based scales. → Tomáš Lintner 2024
Evidence¶
Tomáš Lintner 2024¶
Tomáš Lintner. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning 9:50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
q2 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review following PRISMA 2020, preregistered at OSF, searching Scopus and arXiv with reference and reverse searches; the abstract reports "22 studies validating 16 scales" across four population types. There are 3 performance-based scale available, compared to 13 self-report scales.
"This review identified 22 studies validating 16 scales targeting various populations including general population, higher education students, secondary education students, and teachers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Post-2024 instrument development expanded objective AI-literacy measurement, which had been dominated by self-report scales — related
- Populations most exposed to agentic AI risks are least served by AI literacy research: no scale has been tested for cross-cultural validity — related
- AI literacy scales show good structural validity and internal consistency but are rarely tested for other measurement properties — related
- Interpretability and feasibility of AI literacy scales remain largely unknown, and open raw data is scarce — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
review-22-studies-16-ai-literacy-scales |
title |
A 2024 systematic review identified 22 studies validating 16 AI literacy scales, most of them self-report rather than performance-based |
description |
A 2024 systematic review identified 22 studies validating 16 AI literacy scales, most of them self-report rather than performance-based |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tomáš-lintner-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.