Systematic review finds operational teaming most common (62.5%) and no empirical evidence of synergistic teacher-AI teaming¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a systematic review of 103 teacher-facing AI studies (2010-2025), operational teaming appeared in 62.5% of studies, transactional and situational each in 17.5%, praxical in 2.5%, and synergistic teaming was absent. → Mutlu Cukurova 2025
Evidence¶
Mutlu Cukurova 2025¶
Mutlu Cukurova, Wannapon Suraworachet, Qi Zhou, and Sahan Bulathwela. (2025). Towards Synergistic Teacher-AI Interactions with Generative Artificial Intelligence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19580 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.19580
q3 · i? · review · r2
Systematic review following Kitchenham guidelines: over 7000 Web of Science articles screened by two coders (Cohen's K = 0.82), four coders extracted data (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.69), and "Full extraction resulted in 103 studies." GenAI-powered tools represented 39% of included studies.
"Full extraction resulted in 103 studies. Information on AI type and teacher-AI teaming levels was recorded, enabling a secondary analysis of GenAI-powered teacher-facing tools, representing 39% of the included studies."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Praxical teacher-AI grading teaming decreased grading time by 44% and increased accuracy by 6% versus manual grading — related
- Rigorous investigation of GenAI's actual educational and cognitive effects remains limited despite increasing integration into learning environments — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
review-operational-teaming-most-common-no-synergistic |
title |
Systematic review finds operational teaming most common (62.5%) and no empirical evidence of synergistic teacher-AI teaming |
description |
Systematic review finds operational teaming most common (62.5%) and no empirical evidence of synergistic teacher-AI teaming |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mutlu-cukurova-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.