Log-file analysis links the greatest post-Opener gains to revisiting an evidence page and spending more time revising initial work¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students who made the greatest improvement revisited an evidence page immediately after the Opener or spent more time revising their original work than other students. → Zertuche 2012

Evidence¶

Zertuche 2012¶

Zertuche, A., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). How do Openers Contribute to Student Learning? International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 79-92. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070484

q2 · i? · causal · r2

WISE log-file analysis of two students per period (one highest gain, one lowest gain, n=6 gain vs n=6 no gain). Among gainers, 67% revisited an evidence page and 100% revisited the embedded assessment for more than 1 minute, versus 33% and 50% among non-gainers.

"The students who made the greatest improvement revisited an evidence page immediately after the Opener or spent more time revising their original work than other students (Table 10)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Revising the material based on log files, mapped learning habits and evaluation results raised achievement in the following semester — related
• Students who participate in an Opener are significantly more likely to revisit and revise their embedded-assessment work than students with no Opener — related
• Stronger self-reported SRL skills manifest in more revisiting of previously completed course materials, especially assessments — related