Claims

Most students rated RLO media components such as animations as helping them understand concepts including Forest plots

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 86% of students reported that media components such as animations helped them understand concepts including Forest plots. → Bath-Hextall Fiona 2011

Evidence

Bath-Hextall Fiona 2011

Bath-Hextall Fiona, Wharrad Heather, Leonardi-Bee Jo. (2011). Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123313/

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive percentage from the student evaluation of the RLOs; the abstract states media components "helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots". No statistical test is reported for this figure.

"Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.