RME combined with mathematical software yields larger effects than RME alone or RME with other methods¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? RME used in conjunction with mathematical software (g = 0.96) outperformed RME alone (g = 0.75) and RME plus another method (g = 0.58). → Juandi 2022

Evidence¶

Juandi 2022¶

Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., & Tamur, M. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Last Two Decades of Realistic Mathematics Education Approaches. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15122a

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Moderator analysis of learning combination (Qb = 8.54, p = 0.01) across 54 effect sizes: Only RME g = 0.75, RME + Math Software g = 0.96, RME + Another method g = 0.58. The authors link this to software helping clarify the complexity of realistic modeling.

"The analytical results indicate that when RME is used in conjunction with mathematical software, it is advantageous."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Implementing RME has a large positive overall effect on students' mathematical abilities compared to conventional approaches (g = 0.97) — related
• The application approach (which student-centred method or technique is used) significantly moderates the effect size, with Activities Based on Multiple Intelligences and Educational Games showing the largest effects — related