Claims

In Quebec's Remote Networked School initiative, teacher collaborative design proved to be relevant, feasible, and sustainable despite systemic limits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Based on multi-iteration design-based research results, the article concludes teacher collaborative design in the RNS initiative proved relevant, feasible, and sustainable. → Joke Voogt 2015

Evidence

Joke Voogt 2015

Joke Voogt, Therese Laferrière, Alain Breuleux, Rebecca C. Itow, Daniel T. Hickey, Susan McKenney (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instr Sci (2015) 43:259-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7

q2 · i? · design · r2

Design-based research over several iterations of the RNS initiative in Quebec (three school districts and 12 schools in the two-year pilot; over 300 schools engaged overall), drawing on questionnaires, interviews, and online artefacts. The conclusion is the authors' qualitative judgment; no effect sizes are printed.

"Despite these limitations, teacher collaborative design was the result of teachers' exercise of agency and leadership as manifested by boundary crossing, artefacts, stories, and new routines or rituals. Based on these results teacher collaborative design proved to be relevant, feasible, and sustainable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rns-collaborative-design-relevant-feasible-sustainable
title In Quebec's Remote Networked School initiative, teacher collaborative design proved to be relevant, feasible, and sustainable despite systemic limits
description In Quebec's Remote Networked School initiative, teacher collaborative design proved to be relevant, feasible, and sustainable despite systemic limits
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — joke-voogt-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.