Claims

Funding cuts in 2008 ended the Roads to Success program and its evaluation in 2009

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2012: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Funding for the program and study was cut in 2008, so both were scheduled to conclude in 2009. → Duncan Chaplin 2009

Evidence

Duncan Chaplin 2009

Duncan Chaplin, Martha Bleeker, Claire Smither. (2009). Rigorous Evaluation of Roads to Success: Design Report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/rigorous-evaluation-of-roads-to-success-design-report

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The report's summary states that "Funding for the program and study was cut in 2008, so both are scheduled to conclude in 2009." This truncates the planned evaluation timeline.

"Funding for the program and study was cut in 2008, so both are scheduled to conclude in 2009."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id roads-to-success-funding-cut-2009-conclusion
title Funding cuts in 2008 ended the Roads to Success program and its evaluation in 2009
description Funding cuts in 2008 ended the Roads to Success program and its evaluation in 2009
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2009
recheck_by 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — duncan-chaplin-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.