Claims

The authors report the robotics methodology also supported social skills such as communication, collaborative work, creativity, autonomy and leadership

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors interpret the methodology as supporting acquisition of communication, collaborative work, creativity, autonomy and leadership; no separate social-skills measure is reported. → Muñoz-Repiso and Caballero-González 2019

Evidence

Muñoz-Repiso and Caballero-González 2019

García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-González, Y. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early Childhood Education. Comunicar, 59, XXVII. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-06

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation in the discussion, not a tested result: no social-skills instrument or statistics are reported in the article. Students worked in small groups of 4-5 members collaboratively during sessions.

"The methodology used also supports the acquisition of social skills, such as communication, collaborative work, creativity, autonomy, and leadership."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.