Instruction increased robust CVS use — designing unconfounded experiments plus providing a CVS rationale — in individual interviews¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2000 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Mean robust CVS use scores rose from .57 of 9 (6.3%) preinstruction to 7.0 (78%) postinstruction, and no student was a consistent robust user before instruction versus 12 of 22 after. → Eva Erdosne Toth 2000
Evidence¶
Eva Erdosne Toth 2000¶
Eva Erdosne Toth, David Klahr, and Zhe Chen. (2000). Bridging Research and Practice: A Cognitively Based Classroom Intervention for Teaching Experimentation Skills to Elementary School Children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1804_1
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Individual interview measure from the classroom study (videotaped interviews with 43 permission students). Robust CVS use combines valid experiment design with a CVS-based rationale; means rose from .57/9 to 7.0/9, t(41) = 11.7, p < .0001.
"increased from a mean of .57 out of 9 (6.3%) in the preinterview to a mean of 7.0 (78%) in the postinterview, t(41) = 11.7,p < .0001."
Eva Erdosne Toth 2000 (2)¶
Eva Erdosne Toth, David Klahr, and Zhe Chen. (2000). Bridging Research and Practice: A Cognitively Based Classroom Intervention for Teaching Experimentation Skills to Elementary School Children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1804_1
q3 · i? · design · r2
Consistency analysis of the same interview measure: 0 of 21 preinstruction students versus 12 of 22 (55%) postinstruction students were consistent robust CVS users, χ2(1, N = 43) = 15.9, p < .0001.
"None of the 21 students interviewed prior to instruction was a consistent robust CVS user (i.e., able to create controlled experiments and justify their designs with a CVS rationale on at least eight of nine trials). After instruction, 12 of the 22 students interviewed (55%) were consistent robust CVS users, χ2(1, N = 43) = 15.9, p < .0001"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Classroom expository CVS instruction dramatically increased fourth graders' CVS performance in individual hands-on interviews — a broader claim this one bears on
- Both physical and virtual training conditions produced equal gains in children's explicit verbal knowledge of the control of variables strategy — related
- Physical and virtual instructional materials are equally effective for teaching fourth- and fifth-graders to design unconfounded experiments when instructional method is controlled — related
- Individual children in both training conditions were equally likely to become good experimenters or nonlearners after CVS training — related
- CVS skill is the strongest predictor of performing valid (unconfounded) experiments in simulation-based inquiry — related
- In the underlying laboratory study, only expository instruction combined with probes produced CVS learning, with transfer limited by grade level — related
- Group CVS performance on classroom worksheets rose after instruction, and experimentation alone without instruction produced no significant gain — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
robust-cvs-use-interview-gains |
title |
Instruction increased robust CVS use — designing unconfounded experiments plus providing a CVS rationale — in individual interviews |
description |
Instruction increased robust CVS use — designing unconfounded experiments plus providing a CVS rationale — in individual interviews |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — eva-erdosne-toth-2000, eva-erdosne-toth-2000-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.