An earlier preliminary investigation of ROOTS found small-to-medium positive effects on kindergarten mathematics achievement measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 In a preliminary 2009-2010 investigation, ROOTS showed a small effect on TEMA-3 scaled scores (Hedges' g = 0.37, p = .037) and a small effect on EN-CBM total score (g = 0.30, p = .187). → Christian Doabler 2014
Evidence¶
Christian Doabler 2014¶
Christian Doabler, Ben Clarke, Keith Smolkowski, Hank Fien, Scott Baker. (2014). Testing the Efficacy of a Tier 2 Kindergarten Mathematics Intervention: Findings of Year 1. SREE Spring 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562831
q2 · i1 · causal · r2
Preliminary analysis from an earlier 2009-2010 investigation of ROOTS in 29 kindergarten classrooms, reported as the basis for the current efficacy trial's expectations. The article reports "Hedges' g = 0.37, p = .037" for TEMA-3 and g = 0.30 for EN-CBM, stating all meet WWC standards for a substantively important positive effect.
"Preliminary analyses generated in an earlier investigation of the ROOTS intervention revealed small to medium effect sizes for the TEMA-3 (Pro-Ed, 2007) scaled score (Hedges' g = 0.37, p = .037), EN-CBM total score (g = 0.30, p = .187)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The ROOTS intervention produced greater fall-to-spring kindergarten gains than control instruction on four of five outcome measures for at-risk students — related
- Kindergartners with mathematics difficulties randomly assigned to the ROOTS intervention made significantly greater fall-to-spring gains than control students on the NSB, ASPENS, TEMA-3, and RAENS — related
- ROOTS and control students were statistically equivalent at pretest on all measures — related
- The Boston replication reproduced significant effects on the TEMA-3, ASPENS, and RAENS and newly found significant effects on the NSB and SESAT, with effect sizes within or exceeding the Oregon study's bounds — related
- Fusion produced no statistically significant gains on proximal procedural fluency (EN-CBM) or distal (SAT-10) measures, though effect sizes were small and positive — related
- The ROOTS kindergarten mathematics intervention significantly improved fall-to-spring gains on three of six outcome measures compared with control, with positive effect sizes on all measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.