Claims

The Roundhouse Diagram group also scored higher on the short-answer concept test posttest than the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group showed a higher level of conceptual achievement than the control group on the posttest of the Force and Motion Subject Short-Answer Questions Test (t=4.264, p=0.001). → Kocakaya and Gönen 2014

Evidence

Kocakaya and Gönen 2014

F. Kocakaya, S. Gönen. (2014). Influence of Computer-Assisted Roundhouse Diagrams on High School 9th Grade Students’ Understanding the Subjects of “Force and Motion”. Science Education International, 25(3), 283-311. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1044458

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent sample t-test of posttest scores on the 20-item short-answer test (15 fill-in-the-blank, 5 true-false with 'because' justifications): experimental mean 30.65 (SD 16.980, n=30) vs control mean 12.18 (SD 7.064, n=17), t=4.264, p=0.001. No effect size printed for this comparison.

"At the end of the study, when the scores of the Force and Motion Short-Answer Questions Test applied to the experimental and control groups were compared, it was seen that the experimental group had a higher level of conceptual achievement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.