RPLA failures are temporally distributed: ethical violations are rare in the first three turns and become significantly more frequent after turn 6¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across all personas, ethical violations were rarely observed in the first three turns and became significantly more frequent after turn 6, suggesting sustained adversarial pressure is necessary to expose constraint weaknesses. → Saqib Shouqi 2026
Evidence¶
Saqib Shouqi 2026¶
Saqib Shouqi, Abdullah Nazly, Januki Wanniarachchi, Ravisha De Alwis. (2026). Adversarial Stress Testing of Role-Playing Language Agents using Multi-Agent Evaluation. ADScAI Conference, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03166 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.03166
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Analysis of 10-turn adversarial dialogues across three personas found "ethical violations were rarely observed in the first three turns and became significantly more frequent after turn 6." The authors conclude short or single-turn evaluations produce systematically optimistic robustness assessments.
"Across all personas, ethical violations were rarely observed in the first three turns and became significantly more frequent after turn 6, suggesting that sustained adversarial pressure is necessary to expose constraint weaknesses."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Multi-strategy adversarial evaluation lowers RPLA robustness scores by 0.174–0.203 points relative to a single-strategy baseline across three personas — related
- Cross-model validation shows consistent degradation under multi-strategy attack across Llama-3.3-70B, GPT-4o-mini, and Claude-3.5-Haiku, with significant differences between models — related
- Automated judging aligns strongly with three domain experts (r = 0.82 for role fidelity) but exhibits a conservative bias, scoring ethical deviation 0.08 points lower than humans — related
- Observer-rated behavioral expression of high- and moderate-intensity ADHD personas declines progressively across turns in unscripted LLM conversations — related
- Consistency degrades under multi-strategy evaluation for all personas, driven mainly by tone instability rather than logical contradiction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
rpla-failure-onset-second-half-of-dialogue |
title |
RPLA failures are temporally distributed: ethical violations are rare in the first three turns and become significantly more frequent after turn 6 |
description |
RPLA failures are temporally distributed: ethical violations are rare in the first three turns and become significantly more frequent after turn 6 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — saqib-shouqi-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.