Relative semantic distance of CRA trials is positively and monotonically related to CRA accuracy¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Trials with greater relative semantic distance between cues and answer yield higher CRA accuracy, with the slope beyond the breakpoint not significant. → Xie 2024

Evidence¶

Xie 2024¶

Xie, C., Zhang, S., Qiao, X., & Hao, N. (2024). Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation. npj Science of Learning, 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00285-z

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed-effects modeling of trial-level CRA data (RSD computed via Word2Vec over a Tencent corpus) in the tDCS experiment; RSD significantly affected accuracy (F1,1517 = 5.01, p = 0.02), and the authors report "a positive monotonic relationship with the accuracy of CRA responses", while the slope beyond the breakpoint was not significant.

"Interestingly, our study revealed that the RSD of CRA trials had a positive monotonic relationship with the accuracy of CRA responses."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The relationship between RSD and CRA reaction time differs by tDCS group: U-shaped under Sham, monotonically decreasing under L−R+, and no clear relationship under L+R− — related