Claims

Rubric-based assessment showed substantial to almost-perfect inter-rater reliability across all three time points

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ) was 0.80–0.89 for the conceptual rubric and 0.73–0.83 for the technical rubric. → Francisco José Jiménez-Hornero 2026

Evidence

Francisco José Jiménez-Hornero 2026

Francisco José Jiménez-Hornero, Eduardo Gutiérrez de Ravé. (2026). Conceptual and procedural knowledge retention in data visualization: a longitudinal study of doctoral learning and instructional design implications. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09808-0

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Two authors independently scored all blinded submissions across T0–T2 after calibration sessions; discrepancies over one point were resolved by discussion. The κ values fall in the substantial to almost-perfect range per Landis and Koch benchmarks.

"Overall, inter-rater reliability was high for both rubrics (Tables 3 and 4), confirming that the scoring process was stable and replicable across time points. The conceptual-under -standing rubric (κ = 0.80–0.89) showed slightly higher and more uniform agreement than the technical-execution rubric (κ = 0.73–0.83), which exhibited greater variability across crite -ria."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id rubric-interrater-reliability-visualization-assessment
title Rubric-based assessment showed substantial to almost-perfect inter-rater reliability across all three time points
description Rubric-based assessment showed substantial to almost-perfect inter-rater reliability across all three time points
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — francisco-josé-jiménez-hornero-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.