Confirmatory factor analysis with 448 secondary students showed the 32-item SAICS measurement model has good fit and high validity and reliability¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a CFA with 448 students from six Hong Kong secondary schools, fit indices met conventional standards (χ2/df = 2.39, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.03, PNFI = 0.81, CFI = 0.95). → Thomas K. F. Chiu 2025
Evidence¶
Thomas K. F. Chiu 2025¶
Thomas K. F. Chiu, Murat Çoban, Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi, Musa Adekunle Ayanwale. (2025). Validating student AI competency self-efficacy (SAICS) scale and its framework. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10512-y
q2 · i? · design · r3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the 32-item SAICS scale with 448 students aged 12–17 from six Hong Kong secondary schools, assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. The article reports "a good model fit" with the printed indices and concludes the measurement model "has high validity and reliability scores (RQ2)."
"the fitness indices of the measured items revealed a good model fit regarding the measurement model's goodness-of-fit: x2/df = 2.39 (< 5.0); RMSEA = 0.056 (< 0.08); SRMR = 0.03 (< 0.05); PNFI = 0.81 (> 0.50); CFI = 0.95 (> 0.90)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The self-report measure supports a refined 13-item, four-factor model with good fit — related
- A confirmatory factor analysis supports a four-factor structure of collaborative group engagement (behavioural, social, cognitive, conceptual-to-consequential) for the QCGE self-assessment scale — related
- A confirmatory factor analysis on a new sample confirms the three-factor structure with acceptable model fit and moderate convergent validity — related
- CFA partially supports the six-dimension structure of perceived AI competence — related
- The ACE-HE measurement model of affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement fits online/blended survey data well — related
- An ACO-derived 12-item short form (GenAI-SRL-12) retains the full scale's factor structure, reliability, and construct equivalence — related
- The SAICS measurement model is consistent across male and female students, with changes in CFI below 0.01 in multiple-group invariance tests — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
saics-cfa-good-model-fit-448-students |
title |
Confirmatory factor analysis with 448 secondary students showed the 32-item SAICS measurement model has good fit and high validity and reliability |
description |
Confirmatory factor analysis with 448 secondary students showed the 32-item SAICS measurement model has good fit and high validity and reliability |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — thomas-k-f-chiu-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.