Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Same-center cross-organ agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.011) in the primary analysis of handbook pairs. → Yubo Li 2026
q2 i? The contrast is sensitive to document selection: restricting to complete short-handbook text leaves the key contrast at 0.002 with a confidence interval spanning zero. → Yubo Li 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Yubo Li 2026¶
Yubo Li, Rema Padman, Ramayya Krishnan. (2026). Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22606 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.22606
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Exploratory Welch t-test comparison across 2,670 handbook pairs with at least 20 non-absent comparisons, stratified by shared center and organ in the production run. The article reports the printed contrast and Holm-adjusted p-value, calling the tests "exploratory because pairs share handbooks."
"Same-center cross-organ agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024 (95% Welch CI [0.007,0.040] ; t= 2.82 ; raw p= 0.0056 , Holm-adjusted p= 0.011 )."
Yubo Li 2026 (2)¶
Yubo Li, Rema Padman, Ramayya Krishnan. (2026). Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22606
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Sensitivity analysis on answers generated from complete short-handbook text, which removes passage-selection differences but changes corpus composition. The contrast drops to 0.002 with a CI spanning zero, so the article concludes the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage and document selection.
"Restricting to answers generated from complete short-handbook text leaves 479 qualifying handbook pairs; the key contrast is 0.002 (95% CI [−0.034,0.037] ; 23 samecenter cross-organ versus 194 different-center sameorgan pairs)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Multimodal LLMs show moderate cross-model agreement on which image-Required items are solvable, with within-family agreement exceeding cross-family agreement — related
- Reproductive health shows the highest coverage gap (82.1% absence) and the highest judge-rated significance among divergent pairs (86%), making it a priority content area — related
- Human-LLM agreement on a complex multi-label codebook falls well below human-human agreement, while LLM-LLM agreement is comparable to human-human agreement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
same-center-cross-organ-agreement-exceeds-cross-center-same-organ |
title |
Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection |
description |
Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — yubo-li-2026, yubo-li-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.