Claims

Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Same-center cross-organ agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024 (Holm-adjusted p = 0.011) in the primary analysis of handbook pairs. → Yubo Li 2026 q2 i? The contrast is sensitive to document selection: restricting to complete short-handbook text leaves the key contrast at 0.002 with a confidence interval spanning zero. → Yubo Li 2026 (2)

Evidence

Yubo Li 2026

Yubo Li, Rema Padman, Ramayya Krishnan. (2026). Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22606 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.22606

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Exploratory Welch t-test comparison across 2,670 handbook pairs with at least 20 non-absent comparisons, stratified by shared center and organ in the production run. The article reports the printed contrast and Holm-adjusted p-value, calling the tests "exploratory because pairs share handbooks."

"Same-center cross-organ agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024 (95% Welch CI [0.007,0.040] ; t= 2.82 ; raw p= 0.0056 , Holm-adjusted p= 0.011 )."

Yubo Li 2026 (2)

Yubo Li, Rema Padman, Ramayya Krishnan. (2026). Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22606

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Sensitivity analysis on answers generated from complete short-handbook text, which removes passage-selection differences but changes corpus composition. The contrast drops to 0.002 with a CI spanning zero, so the article concludes the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage and document selection.

"Restricting to answers generated from complete short-handbook text leaves 479 qualifying handbook pairs; the key contrast is 0.002 (95% CI [−0.034,0.037] ; 23 samecenter cross-organ versus 194 different-center sameorgan pairs)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id same-center-cross-organ-agreement-exceeds-cross-center-same-organ
title Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection
description Same-center cross-organ handbook agreement exceeds different-center same-organ agreement by 0.024, but the institution contrast is sensitive to coverage thresholds and document selection
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — yubo-li-2026, yubo-li-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.