Claims

SART-CO errors rose sharply at BAC 0.048% but changed little thereafter across the 0.048% to 0.10% range, with a suspected ceiling effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? SART-CO performance deteriorated markedly at BAC 0.048% and then changed little across the range up to 0.10%. → Dry MJ 2012

Evidence

Dry MJ 2012

Dry MJ, Burns NR, Nettelbeck T, Farquharson AL, White JM (2012) Dose-Related Effects of Alcohol on Cognitive Functioning. PLoS ONE 7(11): e50977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050977

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Post-hoc comparisons in the 56-participant experiment showed SART-CO errors increased at the lowest dose and then plateaued; the discussion attributes this to sensitivity to disinhibition plus "a ceiling effect, with insufficient trials on which a response should be withheld".

"SART-CO performance deteriorated markedly at BAC 0.048% but changed little thereafter across BAC range 0.048% to 0.10%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sart-co-ceiling-low-dose
title SART-CO errors rose sharply at BAC 0.048% but changed little thereafter across the 0.048% to 0.10% range, with a suspected ceiling effect
description SART-CO errors rose sharply at BAC 0.048% but changed little thereafter across the 0.048% to 0.10% range, with a suspected ceiling effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dry-mj-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.