Claims

Students report satisfaction with simulation-based maternity sessions, agreeing simulation assisted understanding of clinical practice and should precede real practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students agreed that simulation assisted in understanding how the clinical practice will be (m = 4.04, SD = 0.93) and was helpful and effective (m = 3.88, SD = 1.25). → ALFozan et al. 2015

Evidence

ALFozan et al. 2015

Haya ALFozan, Yousria El Sayed, Farida Habib. (2015). Designing, Implementing and Evaluating Preclinical Simulation Lab for Maternity Nursing Course. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.12. https://www.iiste.org/journals/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Satisfaction Likert-scale questionnaire (Table 1, n = 64) completed at the end of clinical rotations. The majority agreed that "Simulations should always precede the real clinical practice (m = 3.95, SD = 0.95)" and that simulation was fun (m = 3.91) and helped build skill (m = 3.92).

"They agreed that Simulation assisted in u nderstanding how the clinical practice will be (m = 4.04, SD = 0.93) Simulation was helpful and effective (m = 3.8 8, SD = 1.25)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.