The Turkish SATS-36 showed a six-factor structure with adequate fit, Rasch item parameters and acceptable-to-good reliability in this sample¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? CFA confirmed the six-factor solution with sufficient goodness-of-fit parameters. → Serhat Aydın 2016 q2 i? Reliability point estimates (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, GLB) fell between .72 and .85, indicating acceptable to good internal reliability. → Serhat Aydın 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Serhat Aydın 2016¶

Serhat Aydın. (2016). Using Excel in Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0017

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Confirmatory factor analysis of pretest SATS-36 responses from the 102 pre-service science teachers. The article prints sufficient F2/sd = 3,79, RMSEA = 0.06, GFI = 0.96, AGFI = 0,96 and CFI = 0,97; the six-factor solution was retained for comparability with the scale's reported structure.

"CFA confirmed 6 factor solution with sufficient overall goodness-of-fit parameters."

Serhat Aydın 2016 (2)¶

Serhat Aydın. (2016). Using Excel in Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0017

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Reliability analysis of the SATS-36 in this sample; point estimates were "found between .72 and .85", which the article describes as acceptable to good internal reliability, with confidence intervals between [.72, .74] and [.84, .86].

"In this study Cronbachís alpha, Mc Donaldís omega and GLB point estimates were found between .72 and .85."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Excel-based statistics instruction improved pre-service teachers' attitudes towards statistics more than theoretical instruction on all six SATS-36 factors — related