Claims

The long-term impact of simulation-based learning on knowledge retention and clinical practice remains uncertain

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Although SBL enhances immediate learning outcomes, its effects on long-term skill and knowledge retention remain uncertain, consistent with findings in other disciplines showing inconsistent long-term maintenance without reinforcement. → Wu Zeyu 2024

Evidence

Wu Zeyu 2024

Wu Zeyu, Huang Yiling, Lyu Ling, Huang Yu, Ping Fan. (2024). The efficacy of simulation-based learning versus non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z

q1 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Authors' interpretive statement in the Discussion, not a tested result of this review; the included trials measured immediate post-intervention outcomes. The article notes simulations "show inconsistent effects on long-term maintenance without additional reinforcement or repeated training," citing other disciplines.

"Although SBL clearly enhances immediate learning outcomes, its impact on long-term skill and knowledge retention remains uncertain."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.