A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A binding state mandate increases milk consumption by 2.7 servings per week (26 percent of the mean), fruit consumption by 1.2 servings per week (16 percent of the mean), and decreases soda consumption by 0.8 servings per week (13 percent of the mean). → Frisvold David E 2015
q3 i? Effects on unexcused absences and tardiness are large relative to the mean but not estimated precisely, and excused absences move similarly in the opposite direction, making an attendance mechanism difficult to conclude. → Frisvold David E 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Frisvold David E 2015¶
Frisvold David E. (2015). Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.003
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ECLS-K mechanism analysis using student-reported 7-day food consumption (panels B and C of Table 8). The study notes the nutrition data are self-reported and do not measure nutrients, but concludes "the results suggest that the availability of the SBP improves nutrition".
"A binding state mandate increases milk consumption by 2.7 servings per week, or 26 percent of the mean, and fruit consumption by 1.2 servings per week, or 16 percent of the mean, and decreases soda consumption by 0.8 servings per week, or 13 percent of the mean"
Frisvold David E 2015 (2)¶
Frisvold David E. (2015). Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.003
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ECLS-K mechanism analysis of administrative attendance records distinguishing excused and unexcused absences and tardies (panel D of Table 8). The study reports the estimates "are not estimated precisely" and that excused absences and tardiness show similarly large relative magnitudes in the opposite direction, so an attendance mechanism is difficult to conclude.
"The results in panel D of Table 8 suggest that the availability of the SBP does reduce unexcused absences and tardiness by a large amount relative to the mean, but these estimates are not estimated precisely"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A binding state mandate makes schools 33 percentage points more likely to offer the SBP, and SBP availability increases math, reading, and science achievement in ECLS-K data — related
- Falsification tests show a binding SBP mandate is unrelated to achievement upon school entry, Title I funding, principal experience, and vigorous exercise frequency — related
- Robust RCTs of school breakfast programs failed to find behavioral benefits, with low and variable attendance and a shift from at-home to at-school consumption limiting impact — related
- The effect of a binding SBP mandate is larger for low-income students, males, and students from larger families, and does not vary with threshold levels from 10 to 40 percent — related
- A binding state SBP mandate increases 4th-grade math achievement by 2.2 points (7.7% of a standard deviation) and reading by 2.0 points (5.4% of a standard deviation) in NAEP difference-in-differences estimates — related
- Each year of attending a school with a binding SBP mandate increases math achievement by 0.572 points (2.7% of a standard deviation), reading by 0.470 points (2.0%), and science by 0.130 points (0.9%) — related
- In NAEP regression discontinuity estimates, exceeding the state threshold increases math achievement by 2.6 points (9.1% of a standard deviation) and reading achievement by 4.4 points (12.2% of a standard deviation) — related
- Regular breakfast consumption is associated with increased odds of high academic achievement in Norwegian adolescent girls and boys, most strongly in girls — related
- High intake of lemonade, sugar-sweetened soft drinks and salty snacks is associated with decreased odds of high academic achievement, mainly in girls — related
- School breakfast programs show suggestive positive effects on academic performance, with clearest effects on mathematics and arithmetic grades in undernourished children — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sbp-improves-nutrition-not-attendance |
title |
A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition |
description |
A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — frisvold-david-e-2015, frisvold-david-e-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.