Claims

A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A binding state mandate increases milk consumption by 2.7 servings per week (26 percent of the mean), fruit consumption by 1.2 servings per week (16 percent of the mean), and decreases soda consumption by 0.8 servings per week (13 percent of the mean). → Frisvold David E 2015 q3 i? Effects on unexcused absences and tardiness are large relative to the mean but not estimated precisely, and excused absences move similarly in the opposite direction, making an attendance mechanism difficult to conclude. → Frisvold David E 2015 (2)

Evidence

Frisvold David E 2015

Frisvold David E. (2015). Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.003

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ECLS-K mechanism analysis using student-reported 7-day food consumption (panels B and C of Table 8). The study notes the nutrition data are self-reported and do not measure nutrients, but concludes "the results suggest that the availability of the SBP improves nutrition".

"A binding state mandate increases milk consumption by 2.7 servings per week, or 26 percent of the mean, and fruit consumption by 1.2 servings per week, or 16 percent of the mean, and decreases soda consumption by 0.8 servings per week, or 13 percent of the mean"

Frisvold David E 2015 (2)

Frisvold David E. (2015). Nutrition and Cognitive Achievement: An Evaluation of the School Breakfast Program. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.12.003

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ECLS-K mechanism analysis of administrative attendance records distinguishing excused and unexcused absences and tardies (panel D of Table 8). The study reports the estimates "are not estimated precisely" and that excused absences and tardiness show similarly large relative magnitudes in the opposite direction, so an attendance mechanism is difficult to conclude.

"The results in panel D of Table 8 suggest that the availability of the SBP does reduce unexcused absences and tardiness by a large amount relative to the mean, but these estimates are not estimated precisely"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sbp-improves-nutrition-not-attendance
title A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition
description A binding SBP mandate increases milk and fruit consumption and decreases soda consumption, but its effects on attendance are imprecise, suggesting the achievement effect operates through improved nutrition
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — frisvold-david-e-2015, frisvold-david-e-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.