Bures, Abrami and Schmid's empirical analysis argues that multiple forms of scaffolding may interfere with each other and that labeling should be designed flexibly to match existing structure¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? In an empirical analysis of labeling under different conditions, the authors argue multiple scaffolding forms may interfere and labeling should be tunable to the existing level of structure. → Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse 2010
Evidence¶
Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse 2010¶
Gerry Stahl & Friedrich Hesse. (2010). The CSCL field matures. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9077-5
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Editorial preview (type e) of the Bures, Abrami and Schmid paper in this issue: the editors report, attributing the argument to the authors, that their empirical analysis of labeling under different conditions supports flexible scaffolding design. The underlying study was not read for this extraction.
"In their empirical analysis of the use of labeling under different conditions, Eva Mary Bures , Philip C. Abrami , and Richard F . Schmid of Canada argue that multiple forms of scaffolding may interfere with each other and that labeling should be designed flexibly so it can be tuned to the level of structure already existing in the educational activity."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CSCL relations matter in two ways: interventions informed by empirical studies can support collaboration, and CSCL environments can foster key competencies — related
- Focal scenario analysis reveals that no existing theory explains coordination of multiple monitoring sources — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
scaffolding-forms-may-interfere-labeling-flexible |
title |
Bures, Abrami and Schmid's empirical analysis argues that multiple forms of scaffolding may interfere with each other and that labeling should be designed flexibly to match existing structure |
description |
Bures, Abrami and Schmid's empirical analysis argues that multiple forms of scaffolding may interfere with each other and that labeling should be designed flexibly to match existing structure |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gerry-stahl-friedrich-hesse-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.