Claims

Little of the existing IRT scaling and linking expertise from large-scale educational assessment is applied to scaling psychological and social-emotional survey constructs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Although extensive guidance exists on scaling and linking IRT-based educational assessments for growth estimation, little of it is applied to psychological and social-emotional constructs. → Megan Kuhfeld 2020

Evidence

Megan Kuhfeld 2020

Megan Kuhfeld, James Soland. (2020). Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000367

q1 · i? · causal · r?

The article asserts a gap between assessment-scaling expertise and practice in scaling psychological and social-emotional survey constructs, noting "little of this expertise is brought to bear" in that domain. The abstract offers no empirical support for this gap statement itself.

"Although there is great deal of guidance on scaling and linking IRT-based large-scale educational assessment to facilitate the estimation of examinee growth, little of this expertise is brought to bear in the scaling of psychological and social-emotional constructs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id scaling-expertise-gap-sel-constructs
title Little of the existing IRT scaling and linking expertise from large-scale educational assessment is applied to scaling psychological and social-emotional survey constructs
description Little of the existing IRT scaling and linking expertise from large-scale educational assessment is applied to scaling psychological and social-emotional survey constructs
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — megan-kuhfeld-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.