Claims

The literature reviewed attributes protective academic and behavioral benefits to positive school connectedness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Per the CDC (2009) as cited by the article, school connectedness was found to be the strongest protective factor for promoting positive academic and nonacademic outcomes for youth. → Kraus 2016

Evidence

Kraus 2016

Kraus, S. E. C., & Cleveland, R. E. (2016). The Effects of a Cross-age Peer Mentoring Program on School Connectedness with Rural Populations. Georgia School Counselor Association Journal. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140852

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Narrative literature review attributing this finding to the CDC (2009); the article also cites Resnick et al. (1997) that youth feeling connected to school were less likely to engage in risky behaviors. No independent analysis is reported here.

"The CDC (2009) found school connectedness "to be the strongest protective factor for promoting positive academic and nonacademic outcomes for youth" (p. 3)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.