School exclusionary policies paradoxically worsen dropout, delinquency, and achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? School district policies emphasizing suspension and expulsion to address attendance problems lead paradoxically to more dropout, delinquency, academic lag, and juvenile justice involvement. → Kearney CA 2019
Evidence¶
Kearney CA 2019¶
Kearney CA, Gonzálvez C, Graczyk PA and Fornander MJ (2019) Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1). Front. Psychol. 10:2222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02222
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Suh et al. (2007), Stone and Stone (2011), and Monahan et al. (2014), that exclusionary policies backfire. Exclusion is also disproportionately assigned to low-income and diverse students. No effect sizes printed.
"school district policies that emphasize suspension and expulsion to address school attendance problems lead paradoxically to more dropout, delinquency, lag in academic achievement, and student involvement with the juvenile justice system"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Suspension is associated with long-term harms including higher risk of grade retention, dropout, and juvenile justice involvement — a broader claim this one bears on
- Exclusionary discipline is ineffective at improving school safety and harms both suspended students and their non-suspended peers — a broader claim this one bears on
- Exclusionary discipline harms students and disproportionately affects students of color, so tracking suspension data can promote positive interventions — related
- Shifting to restorative practices reduced exclusionary discipline and its racial disparities while improving climate and achievement — related
- Environmentally focused interventions appear to be particularly effective for reducing delinquency and drug use — related
- SEL programs cannot produce meaningful long-term growth in authoritarian, punitive, or exclusionary environments; restorative practices are needed — related
- School-based prevention practices appear effective in reducing alcohol and drug use, dropout and nonattendance, and other conduct problems, with small average effects and considerable heterogeneity across studies — related
- Schools implementing restorative justice report decreases in exclusionary discipline such as suspensions and expulsions — related
- Experts report reduced suspensions and expulsions and improved school climate as RJ implementation successes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
school-exclusion-paradox-worse-outcomes |
title |
School exclusionary policies paradoxically worsen dropout, delinquency, and achievement |
description |
School exclusionary policies paradoxically worsen dropout, delinquency, and achievement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kearney-ca-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.