School level moderates the correlation non-linearly, with grades 7–12 showing the most negative correlation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? School level is a significant categorical moderator, with grades 7–12 showing a more negative correlation than grades 1–6 or higher education; mean age is not a significant predictor. → Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas 2020

Evidence¶

Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas 2020¶

Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas. (2020). The Relation Between Students' Effort and Monitoring Judgments During Learning: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09569-3

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Categorical moderator analysis (Table 1: grades 1–6 r = −.349; grades 7–12 r = −.553; higher education r = −.296) was significant, while meta-regression on mean age was not (b = .009, p = .086).

"However, results from the moderator analysis with school level as a categorical variable showed that school level was a significant moderator of the relationship between effort and monitoring,Q(2) = 14.66,p = .001."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Effort and monitoring judgments show a medium negative correlation (r = −.355) during learning — related
• Learner age/level moderates the benefit of negotiation of meaning: high school learners relied on it more than college learners — related
• Age moderates the discrimination–private regard relation: discrimination at Time 2 predicts lower private regard at Time 3 among late (17–18) but not middle adolescents — related