Claims

Schools account for 9.1% of variance in children's bullying behaviour before predictors are included

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The intra-class correlation in the baseline model indicates 9.1% of the variance in bullying is accounted for by schools. → Fink 2017

Evidence

Fink 2017

Fink, E., Patalay, P., Sharpe, H., & Wolpert, M. (2017). Child- and School-Level Predictors of Children's Bullying Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis in 648 Primary Schools. Journal of Educational Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000204

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Baseline empty multilevel model (model 1) with children nested within 648 schools, ML estimation; Table 3 prints ICC .091 and random effects .57 (0.03). The ICC declines across successive models to .044 in model 4.

"The baseline model (model 1; Table 3) indicates that 9.1% of the variance in bullying is accounted for by schools before any other child- and school-level variables were included."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id school-level-variance-bullying-icc
title Schools account for 9.1% of variance in children's bullying behaviour before predictors are included
description Schools account for 9.1% of variance in children's bullying behaviour before predictors are included
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fink-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.