Claims

SCI-A and BAU showed no significant differences on most SRS-2 subscales at postintervention, with BAU significantly better on Social Cognition (d = 0.31)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After controlling for covariates, T2 SRS-2 scores were not significantly different between SCI-A and BAU conditions on most subscales, indicating no clear efficacy differences. → Stichter 2018 q3 i1 On the SRS-2 Cognition subscale, BAU students scored significantly better than SCI-A students (d = 0.31). → Stichter 2018

Evidence

Stichter 2018

Stichter, J. P., Herzog, M. J., Kilgus, S. P., & Schoemann, A. M. (2018). Exploring the Moderating Effects of Cognitive Abilities on Social Competence Intervention Outcomes. Behavior Modification, 42(1), 84-107 (published online 2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517698654

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Multilevel models of the 4-year cluster randomized trial (students nested within schools; 146 SCI-A vs 128 BAU assessed at T1) tested main effects on SRS-2 subscales at T2. The article reports "not significantly different between conditions" on most subscales; Table 2 shows Cognition favored BAU (d = 0.31, p = .013).

"There was a general pattern across subscales, whereby T2 SRS-2 scores were not significantly different between conditions, indicating no clear efficacy differences for SCI-A versus BAU."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.