Claims

Seductive detail amount did not significantly affect transfer performance in Study 1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In Study 1, the SD amount did not significantly affect learning performance measured by transfer questions (b = −0.07, p = .367). → Lukas Wesenberg 2026

Evidence

Lukas Wesenberg 2026

Lukas Wesenberg, Sebastian Jansen, Felix Krieglstein, Felicia Meusel, Sascha Schneider, Georg Valtin, Günter Daniel Rey. (2026). The more, the worse? The influence of the seductive detail amount on learning. Instructional Science (2026) 54:29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09781-8

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Regression on transfer scores in the same Study 1 sample of 191 students; the overall transfer model was significant, F(5, 185) = 3.27, p =.007, R² = 0.08, but "the SD amount did not significantly affect learning performance measured by transfer questions". Equivalence was not tested.

"Contrary to H5, the SD amount did not significantly affect learning performance measured by transfer questions, b = −0.07, p =.367, (see Fig. 3 for a line chart)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sd-amount-no-transfer-effect-study1
title Seductive detail amount did not significantly affect transfer performance in Study 1
description Seductive detail amount did not significantly affect transfer performance in Study 1
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lukas-wesenberg-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.