For second graders, low metacognition at the first measurement point carries no extra risk of low metacognition one year later¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? No specific profile-change pattern over the year was significantly more or less likely than chance for second graders. → Mariëtte van Loon 2024

Evidence¶

Mariëtte van Loon 2024¶

Mariëtte van Loon, Claudia M. Roebers. (2024). Development of metacognitive monitoring and control skills in elementary school: a latent profile approach. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09400-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Longitudinal profile-change analysis of 95 second graders with complete data; although the omnibus Chi² was significant (χ² = 10.90, p = 0.028), follow-up inspection of specific movements found none deviating from chance, so early low metacognition was not predictive of later low metacognition.

"Follow-up inspections for the second graders did not indicate that specific changes over the course of one year were significantly more or less likely to happen than would be expected by chance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Task performance relates to metacognition profile membership at the first measurement point but not one year later — related
• Fourth graders with low metacognition tend to remain low one year later, particularly showing ineffective restudy decisions — related
• Children's text comprehension test performance improved from T1 to T2, driven mainly by second graders, with fewer omission errors over time — related