A sedentary control condition (Italian grammar lesson) produces no improvement in children's short-term memory performance at either age.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The control group showed no pre-to-post improvement on the STM tasks, ruling out a learning/test-retest effect explanation. → Ottoboni Giovanni 2021
Evidence¶
Ottoboni Giovanni 2021¶
Ottoboni Giovanni, Ceciliani Andrea, Tessari Alessia. (2021). The Effect of Structured Exercise on Short-Term Memory Subsystems: New Insight on Training Activities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147545
q3 · i? · causal · r2
In the school experiment, the sedentary control group (Italian grammar classroom activity) showed "no improvement in the control condition (p > 0.05)" in the older group; the Results also report no effect of control activities in the younger group.
"On the contrary, in older children (aged 9–10 years) we found a positive effect of both open-skill activity (one-tailed corrected t-test, t(20) = 2.68, p = 0.007) and closed-skill activity (one-tailed t-test, t(21) = 1.76, p = 0.046) on the cognitive performance at T1, post-exercise retest, but no improvement in the control condition (p > 0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A single bout of closed-skill exercise improves short-term memory performance only in older primary-school children (9–10 years), not in 7–8-year-olds. — related
- A single bout of open-skill exercise improves short-term memory performance in primary-school children of both age groups (7–8 and 9–10 years). — related
- The effect of a single exercise bout on children's short-term memory depends on an interaction of time, age, and exercise type. — a broader claim this one bears on
- Short-term memory task profiles differ by age: 7–8-year-olds show no verbal–spatial difference, while 9–10-year-olds show a verbal > visuo-spatial > motor gradient. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sedentary-control-no-stm-improvement |
title |
A sedentary control condition (Italian grammar lesson) produces no improvement in children's short-term memory performance at either age. |
description |
A sedentary control condition (Italian grammar lesson) produces no improvement in children's short-term memory performance at either age. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ottoboni-giovanni-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.