Claims

Teachers who see AI usage opportunities more frequently use AI significantly more often (r = .45 in class)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Frequency of perceived opportunities to use AI correlates positively and significantly with actual AI use, e.g. r = .45 for in-class use. → Nikolai Maurer 2026

Evidence

Nikolai Maurer 2026

Nikolai Maurer, Mathea Brückner, Christoph Thyssen, Sebastian Becker-Genschow, Johannes Huwer. (2026). Science educators' AI literacy and AI usage in teaching: Implications for post-qualification programs. Computers and Education Open 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100376

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Row of Table 1 correlating current in-class AI usage with the average frequency of perceived in-class opportunities (n = 110, r = .45, p < 0.001). The printed r = .45 is a correlation of large magnitude by the code table.

"In class In class 110 .45 <0.001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id seen-opportunities-correlate-with-ai-use
title Teachers who see AI usage opportunities more frequently use AI significantly more often (r = .45 in class)
description Teachers who see AI usage opportunities more frequently use AI significantly more often (r = .45 in class)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nikolai-maurer-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.