Practitioner engagement initiatives reflected buy-in rather than ownership because leadership developed ideas and decisions before seeking context-expert input¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Both SEERNet practitioner-voice initiatives were more reflective of Attygalle's definition of buy-in than ownership, since SEERNet leadership developed the ideas, made decisions, designed the action plan, and then asked for context-expert input. → Pautz Stephenson 2023

Evidence¶

Pautz Stephenson 2023¶

Pautz Stephenson, S., & Pakhira, D. (2023). Practitioners at the Center, Part II: Reflections on Practitioners' Engagement with the SEERNet Hub. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/196

q1 · i? · design · r1

Authors' self-reflective interpretation (type e) drawing on Attygalle's (2017) The Context Experts, where ownership occurs when context experts are involved from the beginning developing ideas and making decisions. This is an author interpretation, not a tested result.

"Our initiatives were more reflective of Attygalle's definition of "buy-in." SEERNet leadership developed the ideas, made decisions, designed the action plan, and then asked for context-expert input."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Female principals empowered others through shared ownership, committee involvement, and staff development — related
• Deeper co-leadership emerges when staff support lets partners progressively take on responsibility, but recedes when staff carry the process — related
• The article argues the durability of the WSS co-design approach depends on institutionalizing authentic engagement as core practice, not a one-time initiative — related