Claims

Only three reviewed SEL studies measured classroom-level outcomes, and effects on CLASS-measured classroom environments ranged from moderate to large

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only Second Step, RULER, and 4Rs included classroom-level measures, all employing similar measures such as the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, with effect sizes tending to be moderate to large. → Stephanie M. Jones 2017

Evidence

Stephanie M. Jones 2017

Stephanie M. Jones, Sophie P. Barnes, Rebecca Bailey, and Emily J. Doolittle. (2017). Promoting Social and Emotional Competencies in Elementary School. The Future of Children, Vol. 27, No. 1, Spring 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144815

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review finding across the three studies (Second Step, RULER, 4Rs) that included classroom-level measures using the CLASS observational measure of teacher-child interaction quality in three domains. The article reports effects "ranged from moderate for classroom emotional support to large for instructional support." Magnitudes are described categorically; no numeric effect sizes are printed, so impact is null.

"In the studies we reviewed, effects measured by CLASS ranged from moderate for classroom emotional support to large for instructional support."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.