Claims

Universal school-based SEL programs produce statistically significant positive effects on social-emotional and related outcomes, per two comprehensive meta-analyses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Two comprehensive meta-analytic reviews of school-based SEL programs (213 studies in one case and 75 in the other) found statistically significant positive effects on a host of social-emotional and related outcomes, with average effect sizes ranging from small to moderate-to-large. → Stephanie M. Jones 2017

Evidence

Stephanie M. Jones 2017

Stephanie M. Jones, Sophie P. Barnes, Rebecca Bailey, and Emily J. Doolittle. (2017). Promoting Social and Emotional Competencies in Elementary School. The Future of Children, Vol. 27, No. 1, Spring 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144815

q3 · i? · review · r2

The article's synthesis of two comprehensive meta-analytic reviews of school-based SEL and/or behavioral learning programs, compiling 213 studies in one case and 75 in the other. The reviews found that "universal, school-based SEL programs produced statistically significant positive effects." No exact effect size values are printed; the article describes magnitudes only as ranging from small to moderate-to-large.

"Both reviews found that universal, school-based SEL programs produced statistically significant positive effects on a host of social-emotional and related outcomes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.