Self-assessments of diagram boxes are more accurate than comprehension judgments and strongly correlated with them in the diagramming paradigm¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Self-assessments of correct diagram boxes were significantly more accurate than comprehension judgments for causal relations, and the two judgment types correlated strongly (r = .64). → Pijeira-Díaz 2023
Evidence¶
Pijeira-Díaz 2023¶
Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., van de Pol, J., Channa, F., & de Bruin, A. (2023). Scaffolding self-regulated learning from causal-relations texts: Diagramming and self-assessment to improve metacomprehension accuracy? Metacognition and Learning, 18, 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09343-0
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment with N = 427 secondary students randomized to diagram completion, diagram completion plus self-assessment, or control. A t-test showed self-assessments of correct boxes were "significantly more accurate than comprehension judgments for causal relations"; the correlation between them was r = .64 (R2 = 0.41).
"the self-assessments of correct boxes were significantly more accurate than comprehension judgments for causal relations, t(1605) = –2.993, p = .003, Cohen’s d = −0.150."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Diagramming scaffold improves relative metacomprehension accuracy for causal relations in expository texts — related
- Diagramming scaffold also improves absolute metacomprehension accuracy for causal relations, extending the effect beyond relative accuracy — related
- Pre-structured diagrams improved metacomprehension accuracy while self-assessment cues showed no differences — related
- Readers' judgment explanations support a cautious hierarchy of perceptual cues: content, then color, then space, then graphic features — related
- The cue-diagnosticity intervention steered cue utilization: diagnostic cue use increased and non-diagnostic cue use decreased — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-assessments-more-accurate-than-comprehension-judgments |
title |
Self-assessments of diagram boxes are more accurate than comprehension judgments and strongly correlated with them in the diagramming paradigm |
description |
Self-assessments of diagram boxes are more accurate than comprehension judgments and strongly correlated with them in the diagramming paradigm |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pijeira-díaz-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.