Claims

Self-checking of marked test words increases defined terms and decreases new terms in both pupil groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1919 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In both grades of pupils, checking up as a whole increases only the D's and diminishes only the N's. → Grier 1919

Evidence

Grier 1919

Grier, N. M. (1919). The range of information in biology: III. Botany. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(10), 509–516. doi:10.1037/h0073567

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Each pupil revised his own paper with a second series of marks after definitions were checked against textbook glossaries. The article reports checking "increases only the D's, and diminishes only the N's"; E's increased only in first term pupils.

"In both grades of pupils, checking up as a whole increases only the D's, and diminishes only the N's; the E's are increased only in the first term pupils"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-checking-increases-defined-terms
title Self-checking of marked test words increases defined terms and decreases new terms in both pupil groups
description Self-checking of marked test words increases defined terms and decreases new terms in both pupil groups
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1919
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — grier-1919

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.