Self-created cheat sheet users reported significantly longer midterm preparation time than instructor-provided users, but the difference was not significant for the final exam¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Midterm preparation time distributions differed significantly by cheat sheet type, with self-created users reporting longer preparation. → Helen Weixu Chen 2026
q3 i? For the final exam, the difference in preparation time between the two cheat sheet types was not statistically significant. → Helen Weixu Chen 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Helen Weixu Chen 2026¶
Helen Weixu Chen, Victoria Sakhnini, and Lesley Istead. (2026). Make or Take: How Students Navigate Self-Created and Instructor-Provided Cheat Sheets. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1145/3834566
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Chi-square tests of independence compared ordinal preparation-time frequency distributions between self-created and instructor-provided users. "𝜒 2 = 12.58, 𝑝= 0.0056 < 0.05" for the midterm; no effect size was printed.
"For the midterm, participants using self-created cheat sheets reported much longer preparation time than those using instructor-provided cheat sheets (𝜒 2 = 12.58, 𝑝= 0.0056 < 0.05, 𝑑𝑓= 3)."
Helen Weixu Chen 2026 (2)¶
Helen Weixu Chen, Victoria Sakhnini, and Lesley Istead. (2026). Make or Take: How Students Navigate Self-Created and Instructor-Provided Cheat Sheets. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1145/3834566
q3 · i? · associational · r1
The same chi-square comparison for the final exam showed "this difference was not statistically significant (𝜒 2 = 2.34, 𝑝= 0.51"; equivalence was not tested.
"However, for the final exam, this difference was not statistically significant (𝜒 2 = 2.34, 𝑝= 0.51, 𝑑𝑓= 3)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cheat sheet type was not significantly associated with exam performance on either exam, though a moderate non-significant trend favoured self-created sheets on the final — related
- Most participants reported that cheat sheets boosted their confidence and efficiency during exams — related
- Most students used cheat sheets as an occasional backup or continuous aid rather than a one-time reference — related
- Students using self-created cheat sheets reported greater perceived coverage of needed final exam content than instructor-provided users — related
- Preferences for instructor-provided sheets were grounded in trust, alignment and efficiency, while self-created preferences reflected personalization, control and studying through creation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-created-cheatsheets-longer-midterm-prep-time-only |
title |
Self-created cheat sheet users reported significantly longer midterm preparation time than instructor-provided users, but the difference was not significant for the final exam |
description |
Self-created cheat sheet users reported significantly longer midterm preparation time than instructor-provided users, but the difference was not significant for the final exam |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — helen-weixu-chen-2026, helen-weixu-chen-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.